← BACK TO HOME

Building 0 → 1: an integrated digital collections platform

Digital collections are meant to preserve and share knowledge — but too often, they live in silos, scattered across disconnected systems.

Discovery should feel effortless, not exhausting.

how do we solve this?

TIMELINE:

Oct 2024 - Feb 2025

TEAM:

4 MetaData Specialists, 1 Product Manager, Director (Digital Library), 2 Web Developers

ROLE:

UX Researcher / Web Designer (Sole Design Contributor)

EST. TIME TO READ:

10 mins

Context:

UChicagoNode is a digital collections platform that unifies scattered digital archives into one accessible interface.

for novice users:

  • Search across collections without needing to know where to start.
  • Browse materials through a clean, intuitive interface.

for expert users:

  • Access specialized metadata and advanced search tools.
  • Work across previously disconnected collections in a single environment.
screenshot of uchicagonode
UChicagoNode.

how might we make it easier for novice + experts to search, discover and parse through digital collections?

Process:

1. user research, persona creation.

I talked to metadata specialists, collection owners, and faculty to get a better sense of who we were designing for. The Library UX team had already done some great groundwork—like writing user stories—which gave me a head start in understanding what mattered most to the 120,000+ people who use the Collection Catalog every year.

novice user persona
Novice User Persona: Jake Thompson.
expert user persona
Expert User Persona: Dr. Emily Carter.

2. emotional journey mapping.

Jake wants to find a map of Chicago just before the Great Fire for a school project. How would he go about doing that? I divided every step into 'Action + Task' and 'Thought + Feeling.' This helped me formulate ideas about potential features that would be helpful for the end users of Node.

Emotional Journey Mapping. (expand for full view)

3. competitor analysis.

I looked at other such digital archive websites like - National Library of Scotland, NYPL Digital Collections, Bayerische, Explore Chicago Collection, LUX by Yale, Digital Public Library of America, Internet Archive, CNKI, UIUC / Stanford / Florida, etc. Digital Collections.

i placed emphasis on pointers like:

1. Recommendation Mechanisms
2. Full-Text Search
3. Filter Complexity
4. Advanced Search
5. Visual Design
6. Ease of Navigation
7. MetaData Density
8. Access Permissions
9. Categorization of Information
10. Search Help
competitor analysis
Competitor Analysis.

4. rapid prototyping.

I moved quickly from sketches to mid-fi prototypes, sharing progress often with the Node team and Library UX folks. Regular feedback and brainstorm sessions with my manager helped (quickly) shape the designs along the way.

image from brainstorming sessions
Images from brainstorming sessions.

4. usability testing.

I ran usability tests early in the process to catch design issues before build. I shared a screener via university channels, library networks, and online communities—got ~150 responses. Tested with 8+ novice and expert users across 3 core tasks, each with clear success criteria and follow-up questions. Due to age restrictions, I recruited college freshmen/sophomores instead of high-school students.

Recruitment Message
Recruitment Message.
Survey
Survey.
Task Structure
Task Structure.

Insights:

1. filters & map:

old layout:

“It's difficult to immediately understand the dropdown options.”
“What does 'Format' refer to? And I'm not sure what will appear when I click on 'Rights.'”
“The map is too large; I can't see my search results. Also, how do I close the map?”
old layout
Old Layout.

new layout:

Filters are now displayed more clearly and remain accessible when needed.
Labels like “Media Type” and “Access Permissions” were revised for better clarity and comprehension.
The map is hidden by default, with an easy-to-use toggle to show or hide it when desired.
New Layout.

2. preview cards:

Old Preview Card
↑ Old Preview Card
old preview card:
“I wasn't sure what the highlighted words on the card meant.” “It took me a moment to figure out what kind of item this was.” “It's annoying to click on something and then find out I can't access it.”
New Preview Card
↑ New Preview Card
new improved design:
Additional context was provided beyond just images, while keeping the card layout compact. Content format and access permissions were made immediately visible. Highlighted text was replaced with meaningful metadata such as title, date, and subject.

3. actions tab:

deciding features for the actions tab:
1. save to portfolio?
  • Users typically saved items using document links or Zotero.
  • A built-in save feature was suggested but it did not justify the development effort.
2. expected features?
  • Users valued quick access to details like the owning institution and the ability to report metadata issues.
  • A “Request Access” option for restricted items was also seen as an essential action.
  • Researchers often navigated collections using a mental map. Surfacing “related content” supported this exploratory way of finding materials.
Old Actions Tab
↑ Old Actions Tab.
New Actions Tab
↑ New Actions Tab

Outcome:

1. core interface: search and discovery -

This is how the search and discovery interface looks like in its most current version. The visual design is in compliance with UChicago's branding and identity, accessible across all screen sizes.

UChicagoNode Search and Discovery Interface.

2. collection page: items and info -

This is a template version of how a individual collections will be displayed. My collaboration with the collection owners made sure that they have autonomy over content, assets and the ability to customize filtering according to most relevant metadata.

Individual Collection Home Page. (In Frame: Guerrilla Television Archives)

3. design system: for scalability -

Created 30+ components and variants combined for consistency across the platform. Keeping the UChicago branding guidelines in mind, documented component states, properties, defined values for font, padding, colors collaboratively with the dev team.

Responsive Variants of the Navigation Bar.

Learnings:

01.
Ask a lot of questions. I never worked at a library, did not even know what a metadata specialist meant. I asked questions that were kind of obvious, but obvious questions save time in the future.
02.
Real design is what happens between creating the screens. It's more about collaboration between people, arranging feedback sessions, constantly being a bridge between dev, stakeholders and the users.
← BACK NEXT →